Telecommunication / ICT Training in GSM, CDMA, 3G and 4G

 

Practical ICT / Telecommunication Training in GSM, 3G and 4G at India

Showing posts with label Zamtel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zamtel. Show all posts

Friday, January 3, 2014

Zambian Networks Face Possible Criminal Charges over QoS Failures:

Zambia's telecoms regulator has threatened to seek criminal proceedings against the mobile networks if they do not improve the quality of their service.
The regulator, ZICTA has already sued the mobile networks for breaches of their regulatory obligations, but says that the failures could be considered criminal as well as they exploit the subscribers.
ZICTA confirmed that it has sent a report to the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) to be studied for possible action.
The country has three mobile networks, MTN, Zamtel and Airtel.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Zambian Networks Face Criminal Charges for Quality of Service Failings:

Zambia's telecoms regulator says that it has instituted criminal proceedings against all three mobile phone service providers namely Airtel, MTN and Zamtel, for what it says are a failure to meet minimum standards of quality of service.
The Authority (ZICTA) said that the deteriorating levels of Quality of Service has made communication difficult and resulted in increased public outcry and negative impact on ease of doing business in Zambia.
Under the published Quality of Service Guidelines, ZICTA has an option to invoke either administrative or criminal sanctions arising from the failure to adhere to the set parameters relating to quality of service.
As a consequence, the Board of the Authority, on June 27, 2013 authorized Management's decision to prosecute all the three mobile service providers for offering poor quality of service to the public.
The Authority, on July 4, 2013, instituted criminal proceedings against the mobile service providers on two counts of failure to meet minimum standards of quality of service as specified and published by the Authority contrary to Section 67 of the Information and Communication Technologies Act No. 15 of 2009, and one count of failure to comply with a provision of the Quality of Service Guidelines issued by the Authority contrary to Section 79(1) of the Information and Communication Technologies Act No. 15 of 2009 respectively.